At presentCrapsbettingResidential buildings in China are mainly traded on the basis of construction area, which will lead to the problem of the same construction area of the same project but different use area of the sleeve, so there are often contradictions in various places due to the valuation of shared area.

Recently, Zhaoqing City, Guangdong Province took the lead in issuing a notice on the pricing of commercial housing according to the area in the suite. Cancel the pooling, it's really coming.

Soon, the topic sparked a heated debate, and topics such as whether the cancellation of public sharing would lead to a rise in house prices appeared on the hot search list.

Has been put into effect

The Bureau of Housing and Urban-Rural Development of Zhaoqing City, Guangdong Province recently issued a notice on the pricing and sales of commercial housing in the city (hereinafter referred to as "notice").

According to the notice, optimize and increase the supply of high-quality housing. On the premise of meeting the planning requirements, we should encourage the optimization of planning indicators to build high-quality and low-density housing projects, and give policy support to projects with low volume rate, high green space rate, environmental protection and energy saving, humanized landscape, systematic leisure and strong ecological compatibility.

From May 1, 2024, publicity and sales will be carried out according to the area of the housing suite. We will actively and orderly promote the sale of existing commercial houses. We will increase the application of prefabricated buildings in real estate projects, encourage real estate enterprises to develop and sell commercial houses with decoration, and promote the application of menu-style and set-style hardcover houses.

The "sharing" model originated in Hong Kong in the 1950s, where elevators, stairs, lobbies and corridors were shared by households. Therefore, the area in the suite is much less than the housing area on the property certificate. Usually, the shared area of multi-storey buildings is between 10% and 15%, while that of high-rise buildings is more than 25%.

For a long time, there has been a lot of discussion about the pros and cons of the shared area pricing model. To this end, many places to try to implement a new pricing model, in order to reduce the contradiction of house purchase. Prior to this, Chongqing, Hong Kong and other places have tried to abolish the valuation of shared area.

Will it lead to a rise in house prices?

It is a unique pricing method in China to include the shared area in the construction area. Internationally, housing sales in developed countries and regions are priced according to the area in the suite.

"Public sharing is not reasonable in the first place. Some high-level public sharing is very large.Crapsbetting! " "the house I bought paid a fee of 100 square meters, but in the end, the actual area was only 70 square meters. Who knows?" On social platforms, the pricing model of shared area has once again sparked discussion.

Calls for the cancellation of public sharing have been ignited again. The main contents of the discussion are as follows:

First, the sharing area of commercial housing, decided by developers, there is no industry reference standard, which often leads to some housing purchase contradictions.

The second is to let buyers bear the heating fee and property fee on the shared area every month, but many owners said that they did not enjoy the service on the shared area, and the payment in this case is really unacceptable.

Third, plus the shared area, for property buyers to pay a lot of money, as little as more than a hundred thousand is more than millions, the pressure is not small.

Abolish the public sharing, if you do not raise the average price of the house, it can save a lot of money for property buyers, which will effectively stimulate real estate consumption. But many netizens are still worried about whether the cancellation of public sharing will lead to a rise in house prices.

Netizens are worried that the detailed rules for the cancellation of public sharing have not yet been issued, and the complete abolition of public sharing may lead to many difficulties and problems in practice, thus transferring the cost of canceling the sharing to other places, leading to a rise in house prices in disguise. For example, "will the unit price of house prices be too high after the cancellation of public sharing?" "the management and maintenance of the sharing parts, and whether the fees will be raised in disguise" and so on.

In fact, some regions in China have tried to implement a new pricing method of abolishing public sharing.

According to Southern weekend, although Chongqing proposed pricing according to the area of the suite in 2011, it still retains the parallel provisions of two sets of valuation standards in the 2019 revised regulations on the Administration of Urban Real Estate transactions in Chongqing. A number of local buyers said that at present, Chongqing developers usually give two sets of price standards, both of which will be included in the purchase contract. The total price of the two standard houses remains unchanged, and the unit price of the unit is higher than the unit price of the building surface.

A real estate agent familiar with Yuzhong District of Chongqing said that at present, people in the nine districts of the main city of Chongqing have become accustomed to pricing in the suite, while new houses in other districts and counties and second-hand houses in the city are still priced according to the construction area. However, the city's property buyers pay deed tax, property fees, decoration and so on are calculated according to the construction surface.

According to the Daily Business News, Zhou Tao, professor and associate dean of the School of Management Science and Real Estate at Chongqing University, said: "the abolition of public sharing should be a systematic project, including a series of tax and fee policies and supporting system changes around the area in the suite. If you simply change the pricing method, it is just a gimmick, meaningless. "